<p>Empirical
studies of banking sector risk typically look at either the relationship of
competition to risk or bank capital adequacy to risk but rarely integrate the
two. This raises an issue of potential bias arising from omission of relevant
control variables, and is of particular importance in the light of the
introduction of a regulatory leverage ratio in Basel III. To fill this lacuna,
we provide estimates for the relation between capital adequacy, bank
competition and other control variables and four measures of aggregate bank
risk for different country groups and time periods. We use macro data from the
World Bank’s Global Financial Development Database over 1999-2015 for up to 120
countries globally. </p><p><br></p><p>Results largely support “competition-fragility”, i.e. a
positive relation of competition to risk controlling for capital; both capital
measures controlling for competition are significant predictors of risk, but
signs vary across risk measures; the leverage ratio is much more widely
relevant than the risk adjusted capital ratio; and there are marked differences
in results between advanced countries and emerging markets. Finally, we find
competition drives capital ratios lower in a Panel VAR. We contend that our
results using macro data are of particular relevance to regulators undertaking
macroprudential surveillance because such data gives a greater weight to large
systemic institutions than the more commonly-used bank-by-bank data. </p>
Funding
This paper is part of a project supported financially by the Bank of England entitled “Bank leverage ratios, competition and risk. Does Basel III go far enough?” under Research Grant number RDC201614