: Public Note
Created: |
21/04/2016 11:31:52 |
Modified: |
12/05/2016 11:30:54 |
|
Project: |
|
Author: |
mspivbe2 |
Version: |
1.0 |
Phase: |
1.0 |
Status: |
Proposed |
Complexity: |
Easy |
Difficulty: |
|
Priority: |
|
Multiplicity: |
|
Advanced: |
|
UUID: |
{2ED57FA9-AB65-4138-A043-408DCF3A7F9B} |
Appears In: |
|
Association to MktLoadArea is redundant. Remove<br/>Research use of MktLoadArea - it is associated to an AreaLoadCurve. How would this be any different than what is already defined in the network model.<br/>5/5/2016: Should the MktLoadArea class be removed? Run through use cases of RegisteredLoad (aggregate/virtual) to identify if the relationship to MktLoadArea is still needed. <br/>The LoadForecast has been represented with the AreaLoadCurve.<br/>5/12/2016: Remove red associations; Action Item: Review existing project implementations to see how the EMS Load Areas are being mapped to the AggregateNodes from a Market perspective.<br/>Is a LFZ AggregateNode an abstraction of Load Area. <br/>Add MktLoadArea/AreaLoadCurve to the WG13 touch points.<br/>