: Public Note
Created: |
08/01/2011 13:54:09 |
Modified: |
01/01/2016 13:03:34 |
|
Project: |
|
Author: |
T. Kostic |
Version: |
1.0 |
Phase: |
1.0 |
Status: |
Proposed |
Complexity: |
Easy |
Difficulty: |
|
Priority: |
|
Multiplicity: |
|
Advanced: |
|
UUID: |
{3C32F0DE-1100-4246-BD37-E374F4F8CF8F} |
Appears In: |
13-Wires: Other |
[tk, 2011-01-09]<br/><ul>
<li>BranchEndFlow: In CIM13+, instead of first two attributes in BranchEndFlow, you should use IEC61970::StateVariables::SvPowerFlow. And, instead of rating attributes, you should just use relevant classes from IEC61970::OperationalLimits if they are meant to be operational limits (as for power flow kind of studies, which I think they are). - <font color="#008040"><b>Will consider</b></font></li><li>SwitchStatus: Instead of this class, you should be using IEC61970::StateVariables::SvStatus and then just remove both SwitchStatus and Mkt_Switch class. - <font color="#008040"><b>Will consider</b></font></li><li>ShuntCompensatorDynamicData: Attributes mVARInjection, connectionStatus and stepPosition should be replaced by relevant IEC61970::StateVariables classes (if required, new classes should be added there if not existing). That package is supposed to be used for dynamic data exchange (such as power flow solutions). Also, you could use less clumsy name for 'voltageRegulationStatus', e.g. 'regulatesVoltage' or similar. - <font color="#008040"><b>Will consider</b></font></li><li>TapChangerDynamicData: Similar comment as for ShuntCompensatorDynamicData. Also, consider renaming 'voltageRegulationStatus' and 'angleRegulationStatus' to e.g. 'regulatesVoltage' and 'regulatesAngle'. - <font color="#008040"><b>Will consider</b></font></li></ul>
<br/><br/>